Friday 8 March 2013

The GUU Misogyny Row: Why the Leftists Must Take a Back Seat

In the final of the Glasgow Ancients debate, held at the GUU, two female debaters were allegedly subject to sexist abuse by some board members of the Glasgow University Union. You can read about the abuse Rebecca Meredith and Marlena Velles were subject to here.

Much of the student body at Glasgow University have reacted angrily to the stories of misogyny and petitions and facebook pages condemning the actions of these GUU board members sprung up quickly. Many societies have dissafiliated with the GUU in the wake of the allegations, including the Feminist Society, Labour Club and Scottish Nationalists. Anger has spread across the political spectrum and the comments have been widely condemned by most in the student body. Even those who are generally apolitical have found a voice and have reacted to these allegations.

Glasgow University has a problem, however. That is the extreme leftists. There are large swathes of far-left groups, and people affiliated with the extremist UK Anti-Cut group (who claim to be opposed to all forms of government cuts). Recently they have been very active in ensuring far left candidates have prevailed at SRC (Student Representative Council) elections, similar to the leftist control over the University of Edinburgh's EUSA.

Unfortunately these leftists destroy any chance of reasonable political discourse at the university. Nationalist far-leftists heckled and booed Jackie Baille of the Better Together campaign during the recent mock referendum held at the Uni, causing anger from both Nationalists and Unionists. Anything resembling a protest at Glasgow University has turned into an easily targetted farce as soon as the leftists take control. These leftists took direct action to illegally occupy the Hetherington building only two years ago. Having a wide range of political opinions and groups is healthy for a university, but the far-left craving for absolute power over political proceedings has been detrimental to student politics, and more aptly, to genuinely important protests and political issues.

Students across the UK took part in protests against the rise in tuition fees, myself included. However in Glasgow, as was the case in Edinburgh, the leftists took control and forced their anti-cut agenda upon the protest. As someone who is not on the extreme left, I felt angry that the protest had been hijacked by the far-left and that those of us who are moderate, but still felt we wanted to protest against raising tuition fees, were suddenly associated and involved in those with extremist politics.

We cannot let this happen in the protest against misogyny at the GUU.

If the leftists take control I believe nothing will be acheived in our fight to reform the student union. The GUU board will be able to dismiss the campaign as being another one perpetuated by the loony left brigade, and not one which has support of us moderates, and even those who take little interest in student politics.

So far the campaign is reasoned, and a single issue campaign. I applaud this, but it must remain the same.

Reading a blog this morning by Tarzan Girl I worry that the far left are already trying to stamp their agenda on proceedings. The GUU is largely a traditional, conservative union frequented by the middle classes, as opposed to the more liberal Queen Margaret Union. This makes the GUU the antithesis to the ideals of the leftists on campus. Tarzan Girl's blog is a call to arms amongst the far-left against the GUU as a whole, not simply a call for something to be done about the recent case of misogyny. I am concerned that people who have an agenda against the GUU are using this as an excuse, and aim to use this scandal to further their own, biased, agenda.

Tarzan Girl's criticisms of the GUU are enlightening. She dislikes Chris Sibbald for going on a 'Zionist Rant'. This implies that there is some sort of problem with Zionism, or perhaps a belief that pro-Israeli views are somehow associated with misogyny. This is nothing short of a rallying cry for leftists, who are passionately anti-Israel. It emphasises the true problem the far-left have with the GUU. Tarzan Girl complains about the GUU stealing a banner from the illegal occupation of the Hetherington Building, before displaying their trophy on the turret of the GUU. She is carrying bitterness over a student joke and using this as ammunition against the Union as a whole. To really get the leftists angry she has posted a picture of Chris Sibbald wearing a dinner jacket, smoking a cigar. Evidently she believes class prejudice is a valid reason to dislike an institution.

Misogyny is wrong. The misogyny that occured at the GUU is wrong. The GUU as a whole is not. It is a proud institution which needs aspects of it, reformed. This will not occur if the far-left control the protest. We in the student body, whether left-wing, right-wing or apolitical, need to unite to ensure this remains a single issue campaign. That is the only way we can reform the misogynistic nature of some in the GUU board. 

4 comments:

  1. " Recently they have been very active in ensuring far left candidates have prevailed at SRC (Student Representative Council) elections" - and which candidates are these? None of the 'far-left' have ever won sab positions on the SRC, not since 2003.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I find it interesting that such a smear campaign is being run against Chris Sibbald as a middle-class, cigar-smoking Tory, while he is actually a card-carrying member of the Labour party.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Was on SRC in 1991. A good chunk of this article could have been written then, including the obsession of QM folk with GUU. We got hardly anything done on SRC that years because of the relentless obsession of SWP and rest of the Left with Tory-smashing and the Gulf War with EGM after EGM on top of the time spent at Council. The difference between then and now was back then GUU debating was in its pomp, whereas there have been thin pickings in the 2000s, and the current GUU honchos seem to have forgotten the tradition of manners in respect of guests even before we discuss the place of barracking in a competitive final or the place of senior debaters leading by example.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Graduating last year at Glasgow University I was around for most of the incidents referred to around the GU campus. I certainly can relate to the frustration felt at being consistently disillusioned and alienated from a lot of the elements of student politics that I genuinely feel passionate about.

    Students fees and the need for a culture of confronting misogyny are the two examples mentioned above which really do show the sinister aspect to the influence of these groups. When I visited the 'Free Hetherington' with a friend I remember my lasting impression was of complete apathy towards their campaign despite my feeling that the economic management of the GU was undermining many of the principles of the university (the central argument of the occupation in my mind).

    The need to radicalise any political stance that I took was hugely reductive and completely imbalanced. Not only this but the self-important culture of relentless activism seemed to only polarise legitimate issue and issues beyond the realms of reasonable debate.

    My experience was that they completely alienate a huge portion of the student body who, in principle, are often politically aligned to a great degree.

    ReplyDelete

Visitor Map

Locations of Site Visitors